Picray v. Secretary of State

Full title: David PICRAY, Respondent on Review, v. SECRETARY OF STATE, Petitioner on…

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 29, 1997

936 P.2d 974 (Or. 1997)

936 P.2d 974

Opinion

CA A85293; SC S43537

Argued and submitted January 17, 1997

Decision of the Court of Appeals affirmed by an equally divided court; Order of the Secretary of State reversed April 29, 1997

On review from the Court of Appeals.^_

_ Judicial review from the Secretary of State. 140 Or. App. 592, 916 P.2d 324 (1996).

Rives Kistler, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a response for respondent on review.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.^__

__ Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by an equally divided court. The order of the Secretary of State is reversed.