From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Picozzi v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 31, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-00518-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:20-cv-00518-RFB-BNW

08-31-2020

MARK PICOZZI, Plaintiff v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

Plaintiff Mark Picozzi, who is in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections ("NDOC"), initiated this action with a pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1-1.) Herman Munoz, Picozzi's cellmate, has filed a motion to join in this action (ECF No. 8) and a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 9).

Picozzi's complaint raises several different claims, one of which deals with ongoing medical issues that cause rectal bleeding. (ECF 1-1 at 4-25.) Munoz indicates that he is Picozzi's roommate and that Picozzi's rectal bleeding is unsanitary and will cause Munoz health problems. (ECF No. 8 at 1.) Munoz requests to be added to the complaint in this action. (Id.) A pro se complaint must be signed by the plaintiff bringing that complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). As such, the complaint in this action is only valid for the Plaintiff, Mark Picozzi. Munoz cannot proceed as a plaintiff based Piccozi's complaint.

If Munoz wishes to pursue an action in this Court, he must file his own signed complaint in a new case and must either pay the filing fee or submit his own application to proceed in forma pauperis. In light of the Court's order denying Munoz's motion to be added to the case, the Court also denies Munoz's motion for appointment of counsel. If Munoz decides to pursue his claim in a new case, he may file a motion for appointment of counsel in that case. ///

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Munoz's motion to be added as a plaintiff to this action (ECF No. 8) is DENIED and Munoz is dismissed from this action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Munoz's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 9) is DENIED as moot.

IT ITS FURTHER ORDERED that if Munoz wishes to pursue any civil rights claims, he must submit his own signed complaint in a new case and must either pay the filing fee or submit his own application to proceed in forma pauperis.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send to Munoz the approved form for filing a § 1983 complaint and instructions for the same.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send Munoz the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.

DATED THIS 31st day of August 2020.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Picozzi v. Nevada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 31, 2020
Case No. 2:20-cv-00518-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Picozzi v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:MARK PICOZZI, Plaintiff v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 31, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:20-cv-00518-RFB-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2020)