From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Picorelli v. Watermark Contractors Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2022
21 CV 02433 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2022)

Opinion

21 CV 02433 (KMK)

09-16-2022

Jason Picorelli, Plaintiff, v. Watermark Contractors Inc., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge:

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without pre judice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty7 days day period to be “so ordered” by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(B) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

Any pending motions are denied. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Picorelli v. Watermark Contractors Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2022
21 CV 02433 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Picorelli v. Watermark Contractors Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Jason Picorelli, Plaintiff, v. Watermark Contractors Inc., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 16, 2022

Citations

21 CV 02433 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2022)