From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickman v. Musclow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 1998
249 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 29, 1998

(Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J. — Set Aside Verdict.)

Present — Pine, J.P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in ordering a new trial after setting aside the verdict in this personal injury action ( see, CPLR 4404 [a]). The jury found that plaintiff's three-year-old son did not sustain a significant disfiguring scar. The y-shaped scar on the child's forehead, however, is more than 3 1/2 inches in length and is the result of a deep laceration that required 40 to 50 stitches. While the scar may be realigned by surgery when the child is a teenager, it cannot be eliminated and will be noticeable for the rest of the child's life. The court properly concluded that "the evidence so preponderated in favor of * * * plaintiff that the verdict could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence" ( Petrivelli v. Walz, 227 A.D.2d 735, see, Zulawski v. Zulawski, 170 A.D.2d 979).


Summaries of

Pickman v. Musclow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 29, 1998
249 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Pickman v. Musclow

Case Details

Full title:ABBIE PICKMAN, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of DERRICK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 29, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 567