Pickle v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Pickle v. State

    306 So. 3d 771 (Miss. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 3 times
    Discussing the procedural history of Pickle's extensive court filings

    ¶2. "The procedural history associated with this case is quite extensive, as Pickle has filed numerous motions before the circuit court[.]" Pickle v. State , 203 So. 3d 753, 755 (¶4) (Miss. Ct. App. 2016). Just last year, this Court summarized the relevant procedural history as follows:

  2. Lofton v. State

    313 So. 3d 528 (Miss. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 3 times
    Holding that a PCR claim was barred by the statute of limitations because the petitioner failed to show that any biological evidence was preserved

    ¶11. Motions brought under this section are excepted from the three-year time-bar, but only where "the petitioner can demonstrate" that there is DNA evidence to test and that the results of the testing would produce a more favorable result. Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5(2)(a)(ii) ; seeGreen , 242 So. 3d at 179 (¶10) (defendant's request for DNA testing time-barred where defendant "failed to show how a different testing method would produce more probative results than the method originally used"); see alsoGreen , 294 So. 3d at 636 (¶7) ; Pickle v. State , 203 So. 3d 753, 757 (¶¶9-13) (Miss. Ct. App. 2016) (affirming circuit court's dismissal of defendant's request for DNA testing when, among other reasons, defendant could not show such DNA evidence existed). ¶12.

  3. Pickle v. State

    292 So. 3d 262 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 2 times

    "The procedural history associated with this case is quite extensive, as Pickle has filed numerous motions before the circuit court." Pickle v. State , 203 So. 3d 753, 755 (¶4) (Miss. Ct. App. 2016). This Court has summarized the procedural history as follows: