From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickett v. Pickett

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Aug 20, 1945
161 P.2d 520 (Colo. 1945)

Opinion

No. 15,406.

Decided August 20, 1945.

An action for divorce. Judgment of dismissal.

Affirmed.

1. MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE — Meretricious Relationship — Commonlaw Marriage. Where the relationship between a man and woman is meretricious, it affords no basis for a common-law marriage.

2. DIVORCE AND ALIMONY — No Marriage — Actions. Where there is no evidence of a marriage between parties, an action for divorce instituted by one of them is properly dismissed.

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Henry S. Lindsley, Judge.

Mr. A. R. MORRISON, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. RALPH J. CUMMINGS, for defendant in error.


At the trial, the court dismissed plaintiff's action for divorce based on cruelty. She prosecutes this writ to reverse an adverse judgment.

[1, 2] The undisputed evidence is that the initial relationship between plaintiff and defendant was meretricious and there is no competent evidence that it was changed. This cannot be the basis for a common-law marriage. No ceremonial marriage was ever performed. Under these circumstances the trial court was right in dismissing the action.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Pickett v. Pickett

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Aug 20, 1945
161 P.2d 520 (Colo. 1945)
Case details for

Pickett v. Pickett

Case Details

Full title:PICKETT v. PICKETT

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department

Date published: Aug 20, 1945

Citations

161 P.2d 520 (Colo. 1945)
161 P.2d 520

Citing Cases

Kahn v. I.N.S.

They can go their separate ways any time they please. See Pickett v. Pickett, 114 Colo. 59, 161 P.2d 520…

Kahn v. I.N.S.

They can go their separate ways any time they please. See Pickett v. Pickett, 114 Colo. 59, 161 P.2d 520…