From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickett v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 7, 2013
No. 1:12-0109 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:12-0109

01-07-2013

JAMES PICKETT, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN MARTIN, et al., Defendants.


Chief Judge Haynes


ORDER

Plaintiff, James Pickett, an inmate at the Charles Bass Correctional Complex in Nashville, Tennessee, filed this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Susan Martin, Jason Swinea, Steven Alcorn, Jospeh Patterson, and Derrick R. Scholfield asserting an Eighth Amendment claim that the Defendants denied or delayed medical treatment to the Plaintiff after the removal of his wisdom teeth, (Docket Entry No, 1).

A frivolity hearing was held on December 19, 2012 to determine whether or not the case should proceed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, In accordance with the Court's statements in open court and based on Plaintiff's statement of more specific facts in support of his claim, the Court has determined that Plaintiff's claim is not frivolous, and that the Plaintiff states a claim for a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights.

It is ORDERED that process be issued on the Defendants and that Defendants formally file a response.

It is so ORDERED.

____________________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Pickett v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 7, 2013
No. 1:12-0109 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Pickett v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PICKETT, Plaintiff, v. SUSAN MARTIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 7, 2013

Citations

No. 1:12-0109 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 7, 2013)