From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickett v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
May 30, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-482 HTW-LRA (S.D. Miss. May. 30, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-482 HTW-LRA

05-30-2014

CHARLES GLENN PICKETT PETITIONER v. RONALD KING RESPONDENT


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes on pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda R. Anderson and the written objection to the proposed findings and recommendation. Based upon the evidence therein contained, this court, having given full consideration to the aforesaid objection, finds the same not well taken. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted as the order of this court and the court hereby dismisses plaintiffs claims against the defendant without prejudice for failure to state a claim.

__________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pickett v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
May 30, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-482 HTW-LRA (S.D. Miss. May. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Pickett v. King

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES GLENN PICKETT PETITIONER v. RONALD KING RESPONDENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 30, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-482 HTW-LRA (S.D. Miss. May. 30, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wells v. Cain

(state appellate review becomes final on the date the mandate is issued) (citing Gray v. Univ. of Mississippi…

Harper v. Mississippi

The court of appeals mandate issued on October 8, 2013, thereby ending the tolling period. See Watts v.…