From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickett v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 29, 2022
1:21CV500 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 29, 2022)

Opinion

1:21CV500

09-29-2022

KIM PICKETT, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before this court for review of the Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) filed on August 30, 2022, by the Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). (Doc. 23.) In the Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (Doc. 15), be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (Doc. 21), be granted, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. The Recommendation was served on the parties to this action on August 30, 2022. (Doc. 24.) Counsel for Plaintiff filed timely objections, (Doc. 25), to the Recommendation, Defendant responded, (Doc. 26).

This court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [Magistrate Judge's] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the [M]agistrate [J]udge. . . . [O]r recommit the matter to the [M]agistrate [J]udge with instructions.” Id.

This court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. This court finds that Plaintiff's objections do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 23), which is affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 23), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (Doc. 15), is DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (Doc. 21), is GRANTED, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and that this action is dismissed with prejudice.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Pickett v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 29, 2022
1:21CV500 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Pickett v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:KIM PICKETT, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI,[1] Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 29, 2022

Citations

1:21CV500 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 29, 2022)

Citing Cases

Tracy C. v. O'Malley

Although the ALJ does not again cite 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1545, 404.1520, or SSR 96-8p when making the RFC…