From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickett v. Davalos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jul 17, 2017
NO. 9:16-CV-161 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 17, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 9:16-CV-161

07-17-2017

JODY WAYNE PICKETT v. R. DAVALOS, et al.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The court has received the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn, which recommends denying pro se Plaintiff Jody Wayne Pickett's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and instructed Pickett to pay the filing fee associated with his complaint no later than July 14, 2017. Doc. No. 8. No objections to the report have been filed, and the time for so doing has passed. It is therefore, ORDERED, that Judge Hawthorn's report is ADOPTED. Because Pickett has failed to pay the $400 filing fee, his case is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17 day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pickett v. Davalos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jul 17, 2017
NO. 9:16-CV-161 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 17, 2017)
Case details for

Pickett v. Davalos

Case Details

Full title:JODY WAYNE PICKETT v. R. DAVALOS, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 17, 2017

Citations

NO. 9:16-CV-161 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 17, 2017)