From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickens v. Thornell

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 22, 2024
No. CV-24-00321-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Oct. 22, 2024)

Opinion

CV-24-00321-PHX-ROS

10-22-2024

William Ivy Pickens, Jr., Petitioner, v. Ryan Thornell, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Honorable Roslyn O. Silver Senior United States District Judge

On July 19, 2024, Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) concluding Petitioner William Ivy Pickens, Jr.'s petition for writ of habeas corpus was untimely by several years and statutory and equitable tolling are not merited. (Doc. 17). Petitioner failed to object to the R&R. Therefore, the R&R will be adopted in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the R&R (Doc. 17) is ADOPTED IN FULL. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Respondents and close this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED leave to proceed in forma pauperis and a certificate of appealability are DENIED because dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the ruling debatable, and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.


Summaries of

Pickens v. Thornell

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 22, 2024
No. CV-24-00321-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Oct. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Pickens v. Thornell

Case Details

Full title:William Ivy Pickens, Jr., Petitioner, v. Ryan Thornell, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Oct 22, 2024

Citations

No. CV-24-00321-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Oct. 22, 2024)