From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 24, 2020
596 S.W.3d 135 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 83089

03-24-2020

Kenneth PICKENS, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Damien S. De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Nathan J. Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.


Damien S. De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Nathan J. Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas N. Chapman, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Appellant Kenneth Pickens appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief across eight points on appeal, claiming in his first three points that the court applied the wrong standard of review to certain claims, and challenging the court’s findings as to other claims. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Pickens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 24, 2020
596 S.W.3d 135 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Pickens v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth PICKENS, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 24, 2020

Citations

596 S.W.3d 135 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)