From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickens v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 26, 2020
No. CV 19-3698-JLS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. May. 26, 2020)

Opinion

No. CV 19-3698-JLS (AGR)

05-26-2020

DEMETRIUS PICKENS, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Grounds One and Three are deemed unexhausted and Respondent's motion is granted to that limited extent.

After the Report was issued, Petitioner filed a motion to stay this action while he files a state habeas petition before the California Supreme Court to exhaust Grounds One and Three. (Dkt. No. 21.) This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Dated: May 26, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pickens v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 26, 2020
No. CV 19-3698-JLS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. May. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Pickens v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIUS PICKENS, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 26, 2020

Citations

No. CV 19-3698-JLS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. May. 26, 2020)