From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickens v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 1, 2019
NO. 4:18-CV-212-JLH-BD (E.D. Ark. Apr. 1, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 4:18-CV-212-JLH-BD

04-01-2019

JAMES R. PICKENS PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case is REVERSED AND REMANDED. Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff.

DATED this 1st day of April, 2019.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pickens v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 1, 2019
NO. 4:18-CV-212-JLH-BD (E.D. Ark. Apr. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Pickens v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. PICKENS PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 1, 2019

Citations

NO. 4:18-CV-212-JLH-BD (E.D. Ark. Apr. 1, 2019)

Citing Cases

Krummel v. Kijakazi

It is axiomatic that a severe impairment imposes limitations, and an impairment that imposes no limitations…

Grier v. Kijakazi

It is axiomatic that a severe impairment imposes limitations, and an impairment that imposes no limitations…