From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pickard v. Cerliano

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Jul 9, 2021
6:20-cv-00411 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2021)

Opinion

6:20-cv-00411

07-09-2021

Adam Wayne Pickard, Plaintiff, v. Maxey Cerliano et al., Defendants.


ORDER

J. Campbell Barker United States District Judge.

On July 27, 2020, plaintiff Adam Wayne Pickard, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, fled this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Doc. 3. On May 8, 2021, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (Doc. 27) that defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. 20, 22) be granted and this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. No. party objected to the magistrate judge's report.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. 20, 22) are granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Pickard v. Cerliano

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Jul 9, 2021
6:20-cv-00411 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Pickard v. Cerliano

Case Details

Full title:Adam Wayne Pickard, Plaintiff, v. Maxey Cerliano et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Jul 9, 2021

Citations

6:20-cv-00411 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2021)

Citing Cases

Odom v. Gregg Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

“Proper exhaustion means that an inmate must not only pursue all available avenues of relief but must also…