Opinion
2:21-cv-08702-JWH-PVC
05-28-2024
HAROLD PICK, Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; and KENT VANDERSTEEN, an individual, Defendants.
JUDGMENT
JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pursuant to the “Order Granting Government's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 61]” filed substantially contemporaneously herewith, and in accordance with Rules 12(b)(6) and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
1. This Court possesses subject matter jurisdiction over the above-captioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 5 U.S.C. § 552a.
2. The operative pleading is the Second Amended Complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) [ECF No. 56] of Plaintiff Harold Pick (“Plaintiff”).
3. Defendant Kent J. Vandersteen was DISMISSED on or about April 27, 2022.
4. Defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. was DISMISSED on or about April 19, 2023.
5. Defendant United States Department of Justice shall have JUDGMENT in its FAVOR, and AGAINST Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing by way of his Amended Complaint. This action is DISMISSED.
6. Other than potential post-judgment remedies (including those provided in Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), to the extent that any party requests any other form of relief, such request is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.