From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piceno v. Le Grand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 7, 2011
3:11-cv-00588-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00588-RCJ-WGC

10-07-2011

JOE PICENO, Petitioner, v. LE GRAND, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which petitioner, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se. Petitioner has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1.) Based on the information concerning petitioner's financial status, the court finds that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied. Petitioner must pay the full filing fee of $5.00.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date this order is ENTERED in which to have the designated fee sent to the clerk. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The clerk is directed to RETAIN the petition but not file it at this time.

__________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Piceno v. Le Grand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 7, 2011
3:11-cv-00588-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Piceno v. Le Grand

Case Details

Full title:JOE PICENO, Petitioner, v. LE GRAND, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

3:11-cv-00588-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2011)