Opinion
No. 76961-COA
02-13-2019
JOE G. PICENO, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks an order compelling the district court to enforce its orders granting Joe G. Piceno's motions to have copies of his records and discovery delivered to him. Although Piceno has provided this court with copies of two district court minute orders that grant his requests to have counsel deliver records to him, he has failed to provide this court with any documentation demonstrating that he sought enforcement of the district court's order in the district court in the first instance and the district court has refused to enforce its order. We therefore conclude Piceno has failed to demonstrate this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted at this time. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, A.C.J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Tao
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. Richard F. Scotti, District Judge
Joe G. Piceno
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk