Opinion
Argued June 28, 1999
October 18, 1999
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendants' motion for leave to serve a late answer and denying the plaintiff's cross motion (see, Lichtman v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 237 A.D.2d 373; Kranis, P.C. v. European Am. Bank, 208 A.D.2d 904).
RITTER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.