From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Picciano v. Conrad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1978
65 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

October 16, 1978


In an action for the repayment of a loan and for moneys had and received, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 16, 1977, which, inter alia, granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On the present record the motion for summary judgment was properly granted since the claim was barred by the Statute of Limitations. The alleged partial payment of $50 (by a money order) was never "made and accepted" (see Morris Demolition Co. v Board of Educ., 40 N.Y.2d 516, 521), in that plaintiff's son returned the money order with a letter describing it as "totally unacceptable to Mom." Hopkins, J.P., Martuscello, Latham and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Picciano v. Conrad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 16, 1978
65 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Picciano v. Conrad

Case Details

Full title:ROSE PICCIANO, Appellant, v. JOSEPH H. CONRAD, Respondent. (And a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1978

Citations

65 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)