From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Picariello v. Linares Rescigno Bank

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 9, 1942
23 A.2d 396 (N.J. 1942)

Opinion

Submitted October 31, 1941 —

Decided January 9, 1942.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 127 N.J.L. 63.

For the respondents, David Cohn.

For the appellant, Collins Corbin.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Picariello v. Linares Rescigno Bank

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 9, 1942
23 A.2d 396 (N.J. 1942)
Case details for

Picariello v. Linares Rescigno Bank

Case Details

Full title:ANGELINE PICARIELLO ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. LINARES AND RESCIGNO BANK…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 9, 1942

Citations

23 A.2d 396 (N.J. 1942)
23 A.2d 396

Citing Cases

Doherty v. Trenton Trust Co.

It is a settled rule of law that the owner of premises to which the public is invited for business purposes,…