From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Picard v. Clark

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 29, 2022
19cv3059 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2022)

Opinion

19cv3059 (DLC)

07-29-2022

MICHAEL PICARD, Plaintiff, v. DARCEL D. CLARK, in her official capacity as District Attorney for Bronx County and MICHAEL MAGLIANO, in his official capacity as Chief of Public Safety for the New York Unified Court System, Defendants.


ORDER

DENISE COTE, DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 28, 2022, Towaki Komatsu moved for leave to file a motion to intervene in this case. The motion is filed pursuant to the September 2, 2021 Order of the Honorable Valerie Caproni in Butler v. City of New York, 2021 WL 4306951, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 2, 2021).

Under Rule 24(b), a court may grant a timely application to intervene where the moving party "has a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(b) (1) (B). Komatsu has failed to identify any claim or defense that shares a common question of law or fact with the main action. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Komatsu's motion for leave to file a motion to intervene is denied.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 43g, 444-45 (1962).

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Picard v. Clark

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 29, 2022
19cv3059 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Picard v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PICARD, Plaintiff, v. DARCEL D. CLARK, in her official capacity as…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 29, 2022

Citations

19cv3059 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2022)