From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piasecki v. Currie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Apr 7, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-162 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 7, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-162

04-07-2015

TERRY LEE PIASECKI, Petitioner, v. GARY L CURRIE, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER OF TRANSFER

This is a habeas action filed by a state prisoner incarcerated at TDCJ-CID's McConnell Unit in Beeville, Texas (D.E. 1 at 2). Petitioner challenges 2011 convictions and concurrent life sentences for Sexual Assault, Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon, and Robbery imposed by the 284th District Court in Montgomery County, Texas (Id.; D.E. 2 at 4-5).

A habeas action may be filed either in the district where petitioner is in custody or in the district in which petitioner was convicted. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Wadsworth v. Johnson, 235 F.3d 959 (5th Cir. 2000). Petitioner's place of incarceration is in Bee County in the Corpus Christi Division of the Southern District of Texas, 28 U.S.C. § 124(b)(6), and he was convicted by a court located in the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas. 28 U.S.C. § 124(b)(2).

For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a). A habeas application may be transferred in furtherance of justice to the district court within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced the petitioner. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Because petitioner was convicted in Montgomery County, it is more convenient and would further the interests of justice for this action to be handled in the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas. The records of his conviction, the prosecutor and defense lawyer, and the witnesses are all located in the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the Clerk of the Court TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. All pending motions are denied as moot and subject to renewal after the case is transferred.

SIGNED and ENTERED this ___ day of 4/7/15, 2015.

/s/_________

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Piasecki v. Currie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Apr 7, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-162 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Piasecki v. Currie

Case Details

Full title:TERRY LEE PIASECKI, Petitioner, v. GARY L CURRIE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: Apr 7, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-162 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 7, 2015)