Opinion
March 6, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ramirez, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to impose the harsh sanction of striking the defendant's answer (cf., Corona v A-B-C Packaging Mach. Corp., 129 A.D.2d 762; Ricco v. Deepdale Garden Apts. Corp., 113 A.D.2d 822; Ferraro v. Koncal Assocs., 97 A.D.2d 429). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.