From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Piaker v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 21, 1972
40 A.D.2d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

December 21, 1972


Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 7, 1972 in Broome County, which denied plaintiffs' motion, pursuant to CPLR 5015 (subd. [a]), to vacate a prior order dismissing their cause of action and for leave to serve a complaint. By prior order, the court dismissed the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd. [b]) for failure to serve a complaint. No appeal was taken and the time to do so has expired. Appellants have now moved under CPLR 5015 (subd. [a]) to vacate the order on the grounds that there was an "excusable default". The simple answer is that there was no default on the prior motion. The case was dismissed after appellants appeared and urged the court to excuse their failure to file a complaint. They may not relitigate that issue now by changing the statutory label on the motion papers and arguing that the failure to serve a complaint resulted in an order because of an excusable default. Order affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Staley, Jr., Simons and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Greenblott, J., not taking part.


Summaries of

Piaker v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 21, 1972
40 A.D.2d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Piaker v. Strong

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP M. PIAKER et al., Appellants, v. ELLIOT W. STRONG et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Bd. of Managers of Thesouth Star v. Grishanova

The February 7, 2013 decision recited defendant's arguments set forth in her opposition papers and addressed…