From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phojanakong v. Eterno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 2000
272 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 30, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated March 29, 1999, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither plaintiff had sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Before: Joy, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiffs' injuries were not serious through the affirmed reports of an orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Kenneth Falvo, and a neurologist, Dr. Terence McAlarney, who examined each plaintiff and respectively concluded that neither one of them had sustained either an orthopedic or a neurological disability ( see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955). The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see, CPLR 3212[b]).


Summaries of

Phojanakong v. Eterno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 30, 2000
272 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Phojanakong v. Eterno

Case Details

Full title:NOPADOL PHOJANAKONG ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. TERESA ETERNO, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 30, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 627