From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phoenix v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 20, 2017
Case No. 07-cr-20344 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 20, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 07-cr-20344

01-20-2017

DEREK PHOENIX, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris ORDER REINSTATING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE AND HOLDING IN ABEYANCE AND STAYING PETITION

On September 14, 2015, Petitioner Derek Phoenix filed a motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See ECF No. 39. He argues that pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) (striking down the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act as unconstitutionally vague), his sentence under the residual clause of the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines must be vacated. Because Phoenix's petition was second or successive within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h), it was transferred to the Sixth Circuit. See ECF No. 53.

On January 19, 2017 the Sixth circuit issued an order authorizing Petitioner to proceed with his second or successive motion. See ECF No. 54. The Sixth Circuit further instructed this Court to hold Petitioner's case in abeyance pending the outcome of Beckles v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 2510 (2016), but also noted that this Court was free "to consider terminating the stay under appropriate circumstances, either on motion or sua sponte." Id. Pursuant to the Sixth Circuit's order:

It is ORDERED that Petitioner Phoenix's motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, ECF No. 39, is REINSTATED.

It is further ORDERED that the petition is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending the outcome of Beckles v. United States, 136 S.Ct. 2510 (2016), and STAYED. Dated: January 20, 2017

s/Thomas L. Ludington

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on January 20, 2017.

s/Michael A. Sian

MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager


Summaries of

Phoenix v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Jan 20, 2017
Case No. 07-cr-20344 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 20, 2017)
Case details for

Phoenix v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DEREK PHOENIX, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 20, 2017

Citations

Case No. 07-cr-20344 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 20, 2017)