From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phoenix v. Kincaid

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 6, 2023
No. 22-6438 (4th Cir. Sep. 6, 2023)

Opinion

22-6438

09-06-2023

DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STACEY A. KINCAID, Sheriff; MARK W. SITES, Chief Deputy of Operations; LISHAN KASSA, MD; JONITA CONNER, MD; JANET WURIE, NP, Fairfax County Adult Detention Center; 1ST LT. AUGHAVEN, Grievance Coordinator; 2ND LT. MESIER, #252; LT. REJEILI; DEPUTY ABEL, #054; DEPUTY JONES; DEPUTY PLAZICK, Defendants-Appellees, and XIN WANG, NP, Fairfax County Adult Detention Center; DEPUTY PJ THOMPSON, #789; SGT. PUTMAN, #860; S. RAY, DDS; ERICHA RAUF, Director of Nursing; DEPUTY STRAUSER; S. CARLISLE, DDS; LT. PERKINS; LT. PARSONS, #382; LT. EVENS; ARAMARK, Director of Food Services at the Fairfax County ADC, Defendants.

Daniel W. Jamison, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Fessier, Brittany Elizabeth Shipley, TIMBERLAKE SMITH, Staunton, Virginia; Debra Schneider Stafford, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: August 7, 2023

Amended: September 6, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:21-cv-01062-RDA-IDD)

Daniel W. Jamison, Appellant Pro Se.

Rosalie Fessier, Brittany Elizabeth Shipley, TIMBERLAKE SMITH, Staunton, Virginia; Debra Schneider Stafford, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Daniel W. Jamison appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the defendants on Jamison's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. Jamison v. Kincaid, No. 1:21-cv-01062-RDA-IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Phoenix v. Kincaid

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 6, 2023
No. 22-6438 (4th Cir. Sep. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Phoenix v. Kincaid

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STACEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 6, 2023

Citations

No. 22-6438 (4th Cir. Sep. 6, 2023)

Citing Cases

Jamison v. Clarke

Furthermore, the Court was aware that Plaintiff had litigated a variety of issues related to his medical…