From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phoenix Bridge Company v. Creem

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 1906
185 N.Y. 580 (N.Y. 1906)

Summary

In Phoenix Bridge Co. v. Creem, 102 App. Div. 354 [92 N.Y.S. 855] (affirmed without opinion, 185 N.Y. 580 [ 78 N.E. 1110]), a pedestrian was injured.

Summary of this case from S. F. Unified Sch. Dist. v. Cal. Bldg. Etc. Co.

Opinion

Argued May 16, 1906

Decided June 5, 1906

Robert H. Wilson for appellants.

Henry Galbraith Ward and George M. Clarke for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT and HISCOCK, JJ. Dissenting: CHASE, J. Absent: GRAY and O'BRIEN, JJ.


Summaries of

Phoenix Bridge Company v. Creem

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 5, 1906
185 N.Y. 580 (N.Y. 1906)

In Phoenix Bridge Co. v. Creem, 102 App. Div. 354 [92 N.Y.S. 855] (affirmed without opinion, 185 N.Y. 580 [ 78 N.E. 1110]), a pedestrian was injured.

Summary of this case from S. F. Unified Sch. Dist. v. Cal. Bldg. Etc. Co.
Case details for

Phoenix Bridge Company v. Creem

Case Details

Full title:THE PHOENIX BRIDGE COMPANY, Respondent, v . DANIEL J. CREEM et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 5, 1906

Citations

185 N.Y. 580 (N.Y. 1906)
78 N.E. 1110

Citing Cases

Kwikset Locks v. Stewart Commissaries

Specifically, appellant has reference to Kwikset's agreement to "provide adequate facilities and equipment so…

Smith v. Smucker

In Eisenberg v. Kemp, Inc. (256 App. Div. 698, 703) the court said: "It was also error for the trial court to…