From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phinny v. Hay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

November, 1916.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The provision thereon as to striking out the denials in paragraph 10 of the answer does not preclude the defendants to plead denials of the existence of any fact alleged in the complaint in order "to perfect the answer as a complete affirmative defense." (See Einstein v. Einstein, 158 App. Div. 500; Douglass v. Phenix Ins. Co., 138 N.Y. 216.) Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Phinny v. Hay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1916
175 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Phinny v. Hay

Case Details

Full title:ALEDA S. PHINNY, Respondent, v. GEORGE T. HAY and FREDERICK C. LOCKHART…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1916

Citations

175 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)