Summary
In Phinney v. Sheppard, 88 Md. 637, it is said, this section has been before this Court a great number of times. It has been invariably held to mean that the title shall sufficiently describe the subject-matter of the legislation, but that it need not give an abstract of the contents of the act.
Summary of this case from Bond v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreOpinion
No. 392.
Submitted March 19, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900.
Dismissed on the authorities cited.
Mr. William Pinkney White, Mr. George R. Willis and Mr. Francis T. Homer for the motion.
Mr. Abner McKinley and Mr. E.J.D. Cross opposing.
Cause reported in state court, 88 Md. 633. Writ of error dismissed on the authority of Williams v. Eggleston, 170 U.S. 304, 309; Hamblin v. Western Land Company, 147 U.S. 531; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U.S. 586, 595.