From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Philpot v. Rupp

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 12, 1994
640 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-1601.

August 12, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, C. Vernon Mize, Jr., Judge.

Leslie King O'Neal of Holland Knight, Orlando, for appellant.

John A. Leklem of Sparks, Cooper, Leklem Weber, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.


Scott Philpot appeals the final judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Ross Rupp on Rupp's claim for breach of a construction contract. We affirm the judgment after concluding that all of the issues raised on appeal lack merit. Our review of the record indicates, however, that Philpot may be entitled to receive an offset because a balance is due on the contract. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court to determine whether an offset is required in this case and, if so, to determine the proper amount. See Lynch v. Florida Mining Materials Corp., 384 So.2d 325, 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (balance due on contract ordinarily should be deducted from owner's damages for defective work). Accord Grossman Holdings Ltd. v. Hourihan, 414 So.2d 1037, 1039 (Fla. 1982).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED.

PETERSON, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Philpot v. Rupp

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 12, 1994
640 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Philpot v. Rupp

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT L. PHILPOT, APPELLANT, v. ROSS RUPP, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 12, 1994

Citations

640 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)