From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Philosophy, Inc. v. Honeyc

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Aug 6, 2008
No. CV-08-189-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Aug. 6, 2008)

Opinion

No. CV-08-189-PHX-DGC.

August 6, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a motion for default judgment. Dkt. #11. Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the entry of default judgment. Obtaining default judgment under Rule 55 is a two-step process. First, the Clerk must enter the non-appearing party's default under Rule 55(a). Once the party's default has been entered, either the Clerk or the Court enters default judgment under Rule 55(b). See Fed.R.Civ.P. 55; Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986) (discussing two-step process under Rule 55).

In this case, the Clerk has not entered Defendant's default under Rule 55(a). The Court accordingly will deny Plaintiff's motion for default judgment without prejudice.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. #11) is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Philosophy, Inc. v. Honeyc

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Aug 6, 2008
No. CV-08-189-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Aug. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Philosophy, Inc. v. Honeyc

Case Details

Full title:philosophy, inc., Plaintiff, v. HoneyC, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Aug 6, 2008

Citations

No. CV-08-189-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Aug. 6, 2008)