From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Philo v. Reams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Mar 6, 2013
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-394-SPM-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:11-cv-394-SPM-GRJ

03-06-2013

RONDY ALEXIS PHILO, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT REAMS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 55, Defendants' Motion For Enlargement of Time. Defendants Reams, Dickey, Pridgeon, and Koch request a thirty-day extension of time to respond to the Complaint.

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1. Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time, Doc. 55, is GRANTED.
2. Defendants must file their responses to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before April 4, 2013.

________________________

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Philo v. Reams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Mar 6, 2013
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-394-SPM-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Philo v. Reams

Case Details

Full title:RONDY ALEXIS PHILO, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT REAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 4:11-cv-394-SPM-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 6, 2013)