From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 2, 1989
550 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1972.

November 2, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Gary L. Formet, Sr., Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paula C. Coffman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The defendant was sentenced on a drug charge after violating probation. The reason given for imposing a departure sentence was that the defendant violated his probation by selling drugs. Upon a violation of probation, the sentencing court may sentence the defendant only within a one cell upward increase from the original guideline range (Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701d.14.) and factors relating to the violation of probation or community control cannot be used as grounds for departure from the recommended guideline sentence range. See, Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla. 1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1989). See also Dewberry v. State, 546 So.2d 409 (Fla. 1989); Branton v. State, 548 So.2d 882 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

The departure sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded for resentencing.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., and HARRIS, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Phillips v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 2, 1989
550 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Phillips v. State

Case Details

Full title:KIM PHILLIPS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 2, 1989

Citations

550 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

State ex rel Carter v. State

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex-rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 550 So.2d 1189.…

Snelling v. State

PER CURIAM. The departure sentence imposed, based on factors relating to the violation of probation, is…