From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-00654 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-00654 MCE GGH P.

May 16, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 23, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 23, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. Claim 2 of the instant petition is dismissed.

Dated: May 13, 2011


Summaries of

Phillips v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-00654 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Phillips v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:AHMAD PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 16, 2011

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-00654 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2011)