Summary
denying motion to dismiss based on statutory immunity "[b]ecause the crucial analysis of immunity under the [act] requires development of a factual record beyond what is alleged in the complaint"
Summary of this case from Avicolli v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.Opinion
Civil Action No. 06-1338, Re: Dkt. [3].
September 26, 2007
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2007, after the Plaintiff, John Phillips, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion to Dismiss was filed and after Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and objections having been filed by Bruce Dixon, M.D., Allegheny Correctional Health Services, Inc. which are without merit, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is denied;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.
DONE and ORDERED.