From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Nabial

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 4, 2017
154 A.D.3d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-04-2017

In the Matter of Natasha PHILLIPS, appellant, v. Walter A. NABIAL, respondent.

Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant. Judd & Moss, P.C., Ronkonkoma, NY (Francine H. Moss of counsel), for respondent. Arza Rayches Feldman, Uniondale, NY, attorney for the children.


Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant.Judd & Moss, P.C., Ronkonkoma, NY (Francine H. Moss of counsel), for respondent.

Arza Rayches Feldman, Uniondale, NY, attorney for the children.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., BETSY BARROS, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, and ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

Appeal by the mother from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Philip Goglas, J.), dated June 30, 2016. The order granted the father's motion to dismiss the mother's petition to modify the custody provisions of a stipulation of settlement dated July 8, 2015, so as to permit her to relocate with the parties' children to Texas, and dismissed, without a hearing, the mother's petition.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In a stipulation of settlement dated July 8, 2015, the mother and the father agreed, inter alia, that the mother would have residential custody of their two children and neither party would relocate with the children outside of Suffolk County. In January 2016, the mother filed a petition to modify the stipulation of settlement so as to permit her to relocate with the children to Texas. The father moved to dismiss the mother's petition. In an order dated June 30, 2016, the Family Court granted the father's motion and dismissed, without a hearing, the mother's petition. The mother appeals.

We agree with the Family Court that the mother failed to make a showing of a sufficient change in circumstances since the date on which she entered into the stipulation of settlement, such that modification of the stipulation of settlement was necessary to ensure the best interests of the children (see McMahan v. McMahan, 102 A.D.3d 841, 842, 958 N.Y.S.2d 212 ; Sirabella v. Sirabella, 95 A.D.3d 1296, 944 N.Y.S.2d 896 ). Therefore, the court properly granted the father's motion to dismiss the mother's petition to modify the stipulation of settlement so as to permit her to relocate with the children to Texas, and dismissed, without a hearing, the mother's petition (see McMahan v. McMahan, 102 A.D.3d at 842, 958 N.Y.S.2d 212 ).


Summaries of

Phillips v. Nabial

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 4, 2017
154 A.D.3d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Phillips v. Nabial

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Natasha PHILLIPS, appellant, v. Walter A. NABIAL…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 4, 2017

Citations

154 A.D.3d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
61 N.Y.S.3d 649

Citing Cases

Assad v. Assad

In any event, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that there had been a change in circumstances such that a…

Jacobson v. Jacobson

Therefore, that branch of the defendant's motion which was, in effect, to modify the custody stipulation so…