From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Lamar

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 8, 1986
481 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Summary

In Phillips v. Lamar, 27 Ga. 228 (73 Am. D. 731), it was held that a sheriff was liable for money officially in his hands which was lost because he deposited it in a bank on general deposit, or loaned it to the bank. It was stated in the opinion in that case that, after having collected money under legal process, nothing but inevitable accident can relieve the sheriff from liability.

Summary of this case from Puckett v. Chambers

Opinion

No. 85-451.

December 26, 1985. Rehearing Denied January 8, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Cecil H. Brown, J.

Scott L. Sterling of Law Offices of J. Russell Hornsby, Orlando, for appellant.

G. Yates Rumbley of Pitts, Eubanks, Hannah, Hilyard Marsee, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.


We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Orange County Sheriff Lawson Lamar, because the record does not support the defendant's assertion that the federal court decided plaintiff's state court claim for false arrest and false imprisonment on its merits. While it appears clear that the dismissal of plaintiff's action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was on the merits, it is not clear from the record or from the order dismissing the action in the federal court that the state claim was considered at all. Under these circumstances, it would work an injustice on the plaintiff to bar the state claim. See deCancino v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 283 So.2d 97 (Fla. 1973). Thus, the summary judgment on this claim was erroneous. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Phillips v. Lamar

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 8, 1986
481 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

In Phillips v. Lamar, 27 Ga. 228 (73 Am. D. 731), it was held that a sheriff was liable for money officially in his hands which was lost because he deposited it in a bank on general deposit, or loaned it to the bank. It was stated in the opinion in that case that, after having collected money under legal process, nothing but inevitable accident can relieve the sheriff from liability.

Summary of this case from Puckett v. Chambers
Case details for

Phillips v. Lamar

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY A. PHILLIPS, APPELLANT, v. LAWSON LAMAR, ETC., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 8, 1986

Citations

481 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Sunflower Compress Co. v. Clark

If a sheriff collects money, and of his own accord deposits the money in a bank which fails, he is liable to…

Puckett v. Walker

See Perdue v. McKenzie, 194 Ga. 356 ( 21 S.E.2d 705). ( a) The instant case, involving authority of the clerk…