From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Koenig

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 16, 2021
Case No. CV 20-07612-JWH (PD) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. CV 20-07612-JWH (PD)

02-16-2021

HENRY BENJAMIN PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. CRAIG KOENIG, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that it erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed without prejudice. DATED: February 16, 2021

/s/_________

JOHN W. HOLCOMB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Phillips v. Koenig

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 16, 2021
Case No. CV 20-07612-JWH (PD) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Phillips v. Koenig

Case Details

Full title:HENRY BENJAMIN PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. CRAIG KOENIG, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 16, 2021

Citations

Case No. CV 20-07612-JWH (PD) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2021)