From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Fisherman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 28, 2010
No. CIV S-09-3266 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3266 GEB DAD P.

July 28, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's July 13, 2010 motion to proceed in forma pauperis, along with his July 13, 2010 motion requesting that the court direct prison officials to provide him with his trust account statement.

On November 20, 2009, the defendants removed this case from the Solano County Superior Court to this court. At that time, the $350 filing fee for this action was paid in full. Accordingly, plaintiff's motions will be denied as unnecessary.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's July 13, 2010 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 19) is denied as unnecessary; and

2. Plaintiff's July 13, 2010 motion to direct the prison to provide plaintiff with his trust account statement (Doc. No. 18) is denied as unnecessary.


Summaries of

Phillips v. Fisherman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 28, 2010
No. CIV S-09-3266 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2010)
Case details for

Phillips v. Fisherman

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES PHILLIPS, Plaintiff, v. L. FISHERMAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 28, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3266 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 28, 2010)