From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Compton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 16, 2024
4:23-CV-01162-BSM (E.D. Ark. Feb. 16, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-CV-01162-BSM

02-16-2024

ANTIONA LEE PHILLIPS ADC #162493 PLAINTIFF v. DONALD COMPTON, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Having reviewed the record de novo, Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's recommended disposition [Doc. No. 6] is adopted and Antiona Phillips's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Phillips has not filed a properly completed in forma pauperis application or paid his full filing fee within the time to do so. See Doc. No. 3. The clerk is directed to refund to Phillips the amount of any payment intended to pay his filing fee if one is later received. An in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Phillips v. Compton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Feb 16, 2024
4:23-CV-01162-BSM (E.D. Ark. Feb. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Phillips v. Compton

Case Details

Full title:ANTIONA LEE PHILLIPS ADC #162493 PLAINTIFF v. DONALD COMPTON, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Feb 16, 2024

Citations

4:23-CV-01162-BSM (E.D. Ark. Feb. 16, 2024)