Opinion
Civil Action 16-609 17-787 17-832 19-983
01-31-2024
ORDER
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
AND NOW this 31st day of January, 2024, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, Plaintiffs' counsel, in their responses to the Motions to Dismiss, shall, in addition to their contentions as to the statute of limitations, show cause as to why the cases should not be dismissed because of the long delay from the filing of the Complaint until this reassignment. The Court will extend the time due for Plaintiffs' responses to the Motions to Dismiss to February 12, 2024. Defendants may file a reply brief by February 20, 2024.