Opinion
No. 08-16498.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed January 27, 2009.
John Phillips, Oakland, CA, pro se.
Rachel Wagner, Esquire, Office of The City Attorney, Oakland, CA, Michael T. Pyle, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, Jill T. Bowers, Esquire, AGCA — Office of The California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Claudia Wilken, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 4:07-cv-03885-CW.
Before: O'SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Upon review of the record and appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's final judgment. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).