From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips v. Caruss

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Dec 19, 2022
No. 360338 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2022)

Opinion

360338

12-19-2022

T Matthew Phillips v. Jessica Caruss


LC No. 2021-000820-NZ

ORDER

Michael F. Gadola, Chief Judge Pro Tem, acting under MCR 7.211(E)(2), orders:

The appellant's motion to file late answer is STRICKEN for failure to conform to the requirements of MCR 7.211(A)(2). The motion does not conform because of the failure to pay the appropriate motion fee.


Summaries of

Phillips v. Caruss

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Dec 19, 2022
No. 360338 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Phillips v. Caruss

Case Details

Full title:T Matthew Phillips v. Jessica Caruss

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Dec 19, 2022

Citations

No. 360338 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2022)