From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillips, Jr. v. Dist. Ct.

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
May 19, 1975
535 P.2d 199 (Colo. 1975)

Opinion

No. 26802

Decided May 19, 1975

Original Proceeding Rule Discharged

Walter L. Gerash, P.C., Thomas Frank, for petitioner.

Robert R. Gallagher, Jr., District Attorney, Jerry B. Tompkins, Deputy, for respondents.


The petition for relief in the nature of mandamus alleged that the respondent district court in a non-capital case entered an order which in effect refused bail to petitioner pending trial on charges filed against him.

We issued a rule on the respondent to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted. The petition correctly pointed out that Art. II, Sec. 19 of the Colorado Constitution and Section 16-4-101, C.R.S. 1973 states that all defendants in non-capital cases are entitled to bail.

A response has now been made on behalf of the respondent district court. Also, the petitioner has filed a statement that on May 1, 1975, the respondent district court conducted a bail hearing and set bail for this petitioner. The issue initially presented is now moot, and we therefore discharge the rule.


Summaries of

Phillips, Jr. v. Dist. Ct.

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc
May 19, 1975
535 P.2d 199 (Colo. 1975)
Case details for

Phillips, Jr. v. Dist. Ct.

Case Details

Full title:David James Phillips, Jr. v. The District Court of the Eighteenth Judicial…

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc

Date published: May 19, 1975

Citations

535 P.2d 199 (Colo. 1975)
535 P.2d 199