From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillipi v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 6, 2013
3:11-CV-0272-ECR (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2013)

Opinion

3:11-CV-0272-ECR (VPC)

02-06-2013

DON PHILLIPI, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Plaintiff's motion to compel (#76) is DENIED as untimely. Discovery has been concluded since August 2012, and a dispositive motion (#66) has been fully briefed and is now pending before the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: __________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Phillipi v. Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 6, 2013
3:11-CV-0272-ECR (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Phillipi v. Skolnik

Case Details

Full title:DON PHILLIPI, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 6, 2013

Citations

3:11-CV-0272-ECR (VPC) (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2013)