From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillipe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 13, 2013
107 So. 3d 491 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 4D12–2760.

2013-02-13

Iberson PHILLIPE, a/k/a Phillipe Iberson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No.2007CF013926BXXXXMB. David M. Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.


Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No.2007CF013926BXXXXMB.
David M. Lamos, Fort Pierce, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The motion for postconviction relief was untimely. In addition, it is without merit. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Phillipe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 13, 2013
107 So. 3d 491 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Phillipe v. State

Case Details

Full title:Iberson PHILLIPE, a/k/a Phillipe Iberson, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

107 So. 3d 491 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)