From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Philadelphia Indemy. v. Mendon Ponds Tennis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 1999
259 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 19, 1999

Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Stander, J. — Declaratory Judgment.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in failing to grant' in its entirety the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment declaring that it had no duty to indemnify Mendon Ponds Tennis Club, Inc. (Tennis Club), Roger Wootton and Laura Wootton (collectively defendants) for property damage pursuant to a policy of commercial property liability insurance. The record establishes that the Woottons, who are officers and shareholders of the Tennis Club, made misrepresentations concerning the extent of prior insurance claims on the policy application. Plaintiff submitted "proof of its underwriting practices with respect to applicants with similar histories" ( Church of Transfiguration v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 207 A.D.2d 1039), establishing as a matter of law that the misrepresentations were material ( cf., Jones v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 238 A.D.2d 884; Ferris v. Columbian Mut. Ins. Co., 190 A.D.2d 1061, 1062-1063). Therefore, we modify the judgment, grant in its entirety the motion and grant judgment in favor of plaintiff declaring that plaintiff had no duty to indemnify defendants for property damage that occurred in July 1995. In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to reach the issues raised on defendants' appeal.

Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.


Summaries of

Philadelphia Indemy. v. Mendon Ponds Tennis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 19, 1999
259 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Philadelphia Indemy. v. Mendon Ponds Tennis

Case Details

Full title:PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent-Appellant, v. MENDON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 19, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 511

Citing Cases

Wood v. Ontario Insurance Company

Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. To meet its…

Pratz v. Wayne Cooperative Insurance

Documentation, such as the insurance company's underwriting manuals, rules or bulletins, which pertain to…