From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phil-Insul Corp. v. Reward Wall Sys., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 10, 2014
2014-1078 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2014)

Summary

In Reward Wall, the parties jointly requested early claim construction of certain claim terms found in both Claim 1 and Claim 19 of the '933 Patent. Decision on Appeal, 2016 WL 5107131, at *3.

Summary of this case from Phil-Insul Corp. v. AirLite Plastics Co.

Opinion

2014-1078 2014-1098

10-10-2014

PHIL-INSUL CORP., doing business as IntegraSpec, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REWARD WALL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND NUDURA CORPORATION AND POLYFORM A.G.P INC., Defendants-Cross-Appellants, AND BUILDBLOCK BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, AND AMVIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

PAUL ADAMS, The Adams Law Firm, of Albuquerque, New Mexico, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were MICHAEL T. COOKE and BRETT M. PINKUS, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, Texas. RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendants-cross-appellants Nudura Corporation, et al. With her on the brief were CHRISTOPHER J. SORENSON, AARON M. JOHNSON, and KATHERINE E. MULLER. KORI ANNE BAGROWSKI, Brinks Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Amvic Corporation. With her on the brief was JAMES ROBERT SOBIERAJ. MICHAEL R. ANNIS, Husch Blackwell, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, for defendant-appellee Reward Wall Systems, Inc. Of counsel was ANDREW RICHARD GILFOIL. On the brief for defendant-appellee Buildblock Building Systems, LLC, were DAVID M. SULLIVAN and HARVEY D. ELLIS, JR, Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C., of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Of counsel was TYNIA A. WATSON.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska in No. 8:12-CV-00091, Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon.

JUDGMENT

PAUL ADAMS, The Adams Law Firm, of Albuquerque, New Mexico, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were MICHAEL T. COOKE and BRETT M. PINKUS, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, Texas. RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendants-cross-appellants Nudura Corporation, et al. With her on the brief were CHRISTOPHER J. SORENSON, AARON M. JOHNSON, and KATHERINE E. MULLER. KORI ANNE BAGROWSKI, Brinks Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee Amvic Corporation. With her on the brief was JAMES ROBERT SOBIERAJ. MICHAEL R. ANNIS, Husch Blackwell, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, for defendant-appellee Reward Wall Systems, Inc. Of counsel was ANDREW RICHARD GILFOIL. On the brief for defendant-appellee Buildblock Building Systems, LLC, were DAVID M. SULLIVAN and HARVEY D. ELLIS, JR, Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C., of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Of counsel was TYNIA A. WATSON. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 10, 2014

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Phil-Insul Corp. v. Reward Wall Sys., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 10, 2014
2014-1078 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2014)

In Reward Wall, the parties jointly requested early claim construction of certain claim terms found in both Claim 1 and Claim 19 of the '933 Patent. Decision on Appeal, 2016 WL 5107131, at *3.

Summary of this case from Phil-Insul Corp. v. AirLite Plastics Co.
Case details for

Phil-Insul Corp. v. Reward Wall Sys., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PHIL-INSUL CORP., doing business as IntegraSpec, Plaintiff-Appellant, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 10, 2014

Citations

2014-1078 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Phil-Insul Corp. v. AirLite Plastics Co.

We summarily affirmed the district court's final judgment without an opinion. Phil-Insul Corp. v. Reward Wall…